Regulatory reporting and compliance automation
Regulatory reporting teams must assemble repeatable figures from lending, deposit, transaction, risk, and finance systems while maintaining an explanation of every transformation and adjustment. Spreadsheet handoffs, changing mappings, and unresolved source exceptions make each reporting cycle expensive to reproduce and review.
The challenge behind the workflow.
Regulatory reporting teams must assemble repeatable figures from lending, deposit, transaction, risk, and finance systems while maintaining an explanation of every transformation and adjustment. Spreadsheet handoffs, changing mappings, and unresolved source exceptions make each reporting cycle expensive to reproduce and review.
Connect customer, account, transaction, and finance data so operations and risk teams can work from consistent definitions. These workflows address fragmented systems, time-sensitive exceptions, and decisions that need a clear evidence trail.
Data to bring together
- Regulatory reporting source extracts and report definitions
- Versioned transformation rules, data lineage, and control results
- Approved adjustments, filing calendars, and sign-off records
Source systems are examples of the data required. Confirm connector availability, permitted access, refresh timing, and the authoritative owner before implementation.
How Genedata supports the work.
Configure one connected workflow, then reuse its mappings, definitions, and review process as the business grows.
- 01
Connect and prepare
Map required report fields to authoritative sources and approved definitions. Configure reusable preparation workflows with source snapshots, reporting cutoffs, ownership, and versioned rules so teams can rerun the same reporting basis.
Build the preparation as a reusable visual workflow or reviewed code, with explicit source mappings and validation checks. - 02
Investigate and validate
Automate configured completeness, consistency, and reconciliation checks before generating the reporting dataset. Route exceptions to accountable owners, retain supporting evidence, and record approved adjustments without overwriting the original source values.
Keep shared definitions and source versions with the analysis so another team can reproduce the result. - 03
Publish and review
Publish a reviewed reporting package with totals, lineage, control outcomes, and sign-off status. Deliver it through an approved export or filing-system integration, preserving the submitted version and the evidence required to explain subsequent corrections.
Make the output available to the right people with appropriate access, ownership, and review evidence.
A reproducible regulatory reporting and compliance control package
Make the next run easier.
Reusable reporting mappings, validation rules, and evidence links reduce repeated spreadsheet preparation and last-minute requests for screenshots. Reporting officers can trace a figure to its source and see which exceptions still need resolution.
Start from one approved example. Save the agreed mappings and definitions, publish the reviewed output, and let the next team follow the same evidence instead of rebuilding the preparation.
Measure your own improvement
Track reporting preparation time, unresolved control exceptions at cutoff, manual adjustments, and time to reproduce a reported figure.
Record a baseline before the pilot and compare like-for-like work afterward. Results depend on source quality, configuration, and adoption.Review and responsibility
Responsible reporting officers determine applicable requirements, approve rule changes and material adjustments, and authorize submissions. Configured automation supports reporting controls; it does not guarantee regulatory compliance or create an unreviewed filing.
AI with professional judgment.
Use AI to summarize evidence and explain exceptions. Credit, account restrictions, and financial-crime decisions remain subject to authorized review.
Try the workflow with your team.
Use representative, approved sample data. Agree the expected output and a review owner before extending the workflow to a live process.