Notebook Workspaces
Auto-scaling Jupyter and VS Code environments with first-class access to warehouse tables, vector stores, and the model registry.
Keep notebooks, experiments, and deployed models connected to the same data and governance. Carry context through the model lifecycle.
Auto-scaling Jupyter and VS Code environments with first-class access to warehouse tables, vector stores, and the model registry.
Every run, parameter, metric, and artifact captured automatically — search, compare, and promote models with full reproducibility.
Promote any model from notebook to managed serving endpoint with autoscaling, A/B testing, and integrated observability.
Models degrade because the world moves. Treating the lifecycle as a closed loop — where monitored production behaviour feeds the next round of features and training — is the difference between a model that keeps earning its place and one nobody dares retire.
Each stage writes its inputs and outputs to the registry, so any production model can be traced back to the exact data and code that produced it.
Notebooks query warehouse tables directly under the same policy as everyone else — no extracts to a laptop, no shadow copies.
Parameters, metrics, code version, and dataset snapshot are captured per run automatically rather than by convention.
Models move from staging to production behind approval gates, with evaluation results attached to the promotion.
Input distributions and prediction quality are monitored against training baselines, triggering retraining when they diverge.
Most of the friction in shipping a model is environment, access, and reproducibility rather than modelling.
Auto-scaling Jupyter and VS Code with pinned images, so a notebook that ran last quarter still runs today.
Versioned, shared feature definitions used identically in training and serving, eliminating training-serving skew.
Search and diff runs across parameters and metrics, with artefacts retained for every candidate.
Lineage from a deployed endpoint back through training run, dataset snapshot, and code commit.
Subgroup performance reported alongside aggregate metrics, recorded as part of the promotion evidence.
Autoscaling endpoints with canary rollout, A/B comparison, and request-level observability included.
The workspace has to satisfy the people building models and the people accountable for them.
Start from a managed workspace with governed data already accessible, instead of spending the first week on access and dependencies.
Time spent modelling rather than provisioning.
The features used in training are the features served in production, defined once, so promotion is not a reimplementation.
No training-serving skew to debug.
Trace any prediction back to the model version, training data snapshot, and evaluation results that justified deployment.
Model risk documentation from the record.
Data science outside the platform means copies, and copies mean governance gaps.
| Dimension | Before Genedata | With Genedata |
|---|---|---|
| Data access | Extracts copied to laptops and notebooks | Governed queries under the same policy as everyone |
| Reproducibility | Reconstructed from a notebook and hope | Run, dataset snapshot, and commit captured automatically |
| Features | Reimplemented for serving, subtly differently | One definition used in training and production |
| Promotion | A handoff ticket to a platform team | Registry promotion with evaluation attached |
| Drift | Noticed when a business metric moves | Monitored against the training baseline continuously |
Data scientists shouldn't need to leave the platform to ship a model. Genedata Data Science integrates natively with your warehouse, governance, and CI/CD — so the path from notebook to production is days, not quarters.
The questions data science and model risk teams ask before committing.
Cortex AI is the intelligence product on the Genedata platform — notebooks, experiment tracking, a feature store, the model registry, managed serving endpoints, and the agent runtime. It reads the same governed tables GeneFlow pipelines write and honours GeneCatalog policy, so training data is under the same rules as everything else.
No, and that is the point. Notebooks query warehouse tables directly under the same access policy as any other user. There are no extracts on laptops, which removes the most common route by which governed data becomes ungoverned.
Feature definitions live in the feature store and are used identically in training and serving. A model promoted to production consumes the same feature computation it was trained on, so there is no reimplementation step to diverge.
Yes. Each run captures parameters, metrics, code version, and a dataset snapshot automatically, and the registry links a deployed endpoint back through its training run to the exact data behind it. That trace is what model risk documentation usually needs.
Input distributions and prediction quality are monitored against the training baseline continuously, rather than being noticed when a business metric moves. Divergence triggers a retraining signal with the affected features identified.
Registry, training-to-serving path, and experiment tracking model.
GuideDefining features once for both training and low-latency serving.
ComplianceProducing model documentation from the registry rather than by hand.
RelatedThe pipelines that produce the governed tables models train on.
Walk the full lifecycle with an ML engineer, or start with the MLOps reference architecture.