HTAP Engine
Hybrid transactional/analytical processing — operational writes serve real-time dashboards without ETL or read replicas.
Connect operational and analytical workloads without losing the relationship between a transaction and the insight it creates.
Hybrid transactional/analytical processing — operational writes serve real-time dashboards without ETL or read replicas.
Relational, JSON, vector, and time-series data in one cluster. Query across modalities with a single SQL dialect.
Continuous backup with second-level recovery point objective. Restore any database to any timestamp in the last 35 days.
A row committed by your application is visible to an analytical query immediately, because both run against the same storage with different access paths. There is no replication lag to reason about and no nightly job to keep two systems agreeing with each other.
The engine keeps a row-oriented path for transactions and a column-oriented path for analytics over the same committed data, and picks between them per query.
Full ACID semantics with familiar SQL. Applications treat it as the operational database they already know.
Committed rows are maintained in row and columnar representations, so neither workload is served by a compromise layout.
The planner chooses the access path from the shape of the query — point lookups take the row path, aggregates take the column path.
Continuous backup means recovery is a timestamp, not a nightly snapshot plus a stack of write-ahead logs.
Each modality is a first-class access path rather than an extension bolted onto a relational core.
Standard SQL with ACID transactions, foreign keys, and the isolation levels your application already assumes.
Schemaless documents queried with the same dialect, indexed on nested paths without a separate document store.
Native embedding columns with approximate nearest-neighbour indexes, joinable against relational data in one query.
Automatic downsampling, retention tiers, and interval functions for high-cardinality metric workloads.
Join a vector similarity result to a relational customer table and a time-series metric in a single statement.
Sub-second RPO with restore to any timestamp in the retention window, tested by automated recovery drills.
Collapsing four stores into one changes different things for different teams.
Add semantic search or a time-series metric to an existing service without provisioning, learning, and operating another database.
One connection string, one dialect, one set of transactions.
Analytical queries read committed state directly, so a dashboard reflects the last few seconds rather than last night's load.
Real-time reporting without a replication pipeline.
Eliminate the ETL and CDC plumbing whose only job was keeping four independent stores approximately in agreement.
Fewer moving parts, fewer 3am consistency incidents.
Running a specialised database per workload is defensible until you count the integration between them.
| Dimension | Before Genedata | With Genedata |
|---|---|---|
| Footprint | Separate relational, analytical, vector, and time-series clusters | One cluster serving all four access patterns |
| Freshness | Analytics lag production by a replication interval | Analytical queries read committed state directly |
| Consistency | Four stores that disagree during any sync failure | One committed copy, no reconciliation required |
| Cross-modal queries | Application-side joins across separate systems | A single SQL statement spanning modalities |
| Operations | Four upgrade cycles, four backup regimes, four on-calls | One cluster to patch, back up, and monitor |
Stop paying for Postgres + ClickHouse + Pinecone + InfluxDB and the engineers required to keep them in sync. Genedata Database collapses the operational footprint while delivering best-of-breed performance per workload.
What application and platform teams ask about collapsing four stores into one.
It maintains row-oriented and column-oriented representations of the same committed data and picks between them per query. Point lookups take the row path, aggregates take the column path — which is why analytics can read production state directly without a replica.
Yes. Analytical work runs on the columnar path with its own compute, so a large aggregate does not contend with transactional writes. Workload isolation is enforced rather than advisory.
Relational, JSON, vector, and time-series are first-class access paths on one engine rather than extensions bolted onto a relational core, and a single statement can join across all four.
Continuous backup gives a sub-second recovery point objective, and restore targets a timestamp rather than a nightly snapshot plus a stack of write-ahead logs. Recovery drills are automated.
Standard SQL with ACID semantics, foreign keys, and the isolation levels your application already assumes means most applications move with a connection-string change and a compatibility pass.
Storage layout, the planner, and replication topology.
RunbookPoint-in-time recovery procedures and drill automation.
GuideMoving from Postgres, ClickHouse, or a vector store.
RelatedThe analytics engine reading the same committed state.
Walk your current topology through with an engineer and see what consolidates — or read the migration playbook first.