OT-Native Connectors
Native OPC UA, MQTT, Modbus, and historian connectors with sub-second writeback into the warehouse — no separate time-series DB to operate.
Connect equipment, production, and supply-chain data to put operational decisions in their full business context.
Native OPC UA, MQTT, Modbus, and historian connectors with sub-second writeback into the warehouse — no separate time-series DB to operate.
Pre-built models for vibration, temperature, and pressure anomalies — auto-tuned per asset, with maintenance work orders pushed to your CMMS.
ERP + EDI + carrier feeds unified into a tier-N supplier graph for risk scoring, alternative sourcing, and emissions reporting.
OT data and IT data have different shapes, owners, and network constraints — the platform's job is to make them one record without disturbing the plant floor.
Connects to PLCs, historians, and MES over OPC UA, MQTT, and Modbus, buffering at the edge through network loss.
Learn moreMaps tags to an ISA-95 asset hierarchy so a reading is attributable to a machine, line, and site rather than an opaque tag name.
Learn moreRuns golden-batch comparison, yield analysis, and supply-chain risk scoring across OT and ERP data together.
Learn morePredicts failure per asset against its own baseline and pushes work orders into the CMMS teams already use.
Learn moreIndustry use-case map
These reference workflows connect the business decision to the data, controls, platform surfaces, and people required to operate it in production.
Learn each asset's operating baseline from sensor, historian, maintenance, and production records, then route verified risk into maintenance planning.
How the work moves
Connect the signal
Sensors, historians, and asset telemetry · MES, quality, and production records · ERP, suppliers, logistics, and CMMS
Apply control
Data quality contracts · Operational monitoring · Point-in-time versioning
Build and deliver
GeneFlow Engineering · Data Science & MLOps · Observability & Operations
Decide and act
Condition-based interventions tied to asset context and production priority.
Participating roles
Platform surfaces
Business outcome
Condition-based interventions tied to asset context and production priority.
Explore the full industry solutionOT data historically stops at the historian and IT data starts at the ERP, with a spreadsheet in between. Landing both on one substrate is what makes a maintenance prediction traceable to the work order it triggered and the margin it protected.
Nothing on the factory floor is replaced. The platform reads from the equipment and systems already running, and writes back into the tools operators already use.
Connect to PLCs, historians, and SCADA over OPC UA, MQTT, and Modbus. No controller changes, no line downtime to integrate.
Map tags to an ISA-95 asset hierarchy so a reading is attributable to a machine, line, and site rather than an opaque tag name.
Vibration, temperature, and pressure models auto-tune to each machine's own baseline rather than a fleet-wide threshold.
Predictions become work orders in your CMMS and planning signals in your ERP, so the insight reaches the person who acts on it.
Intermittent connectivity, thirty-year-old equipment, and a hard requirement never to disrupt production are the normal operating conditions.
Edge gateways buffer locally through network loss and reconcile on reconnect, so a WAN outage costs no telemetry.
Each machine is modelled against its own history, so an old press and a new one do not share a false threshold.
Compare any production run against the best historical batch across every process variable to find yield loss.
Map dependencies beyond direct suppliers to see which sub-tier disruption actually threatens a line.
Attribute consumption to line, product, and shift, turning an aggregate utility bill into a per-unit cost input.
Segmented, read-oriented OT connectivity aligned to 62443 zones, so integration does not widen the attack surface.
Operations, quality, and supply chain usually argue from three different datasets. This gives them one.
Move from fixed-interval servicing to condition-based intervention, with predictions tied to each asset's own behaviour.
Unplanned downtime becomes a scheduled window.
Compare a failing run against the golden batch across every process variable rather than the handful the historian charts.
Root cause in hours instead of a shift review.
Model supplier dependencies beyond tier one so a sub-supplier event surfaces before it stops a line.
Sourcing decisions made with lead time to spare.
The historian and the ERP each hold half the answer, and the join is usually a person with a spreadsheet.
| Dimension | Before Genedata | With Genedata |
|---|---|---|
| OT data | Trapped in per-site historians | Streamed to one governed store, still available locally |
| Maintenance | Fixed intervals plus reactive repair | Condition-based, per-asset predictions |
| Quality analysis | Manual comparison of a few charted variables | Golden-batch comparison across all variables |
| Supplier risk | Visibility stops at tier one | Tier-N dependency graph with risk scoring |
| Connectivity | A network outage loses the window | Edge buffering reconciles on reconnect |
Genedata Manufacturing gives operations, quality, and supply chain teams a single, governed view of every asset, line, and shipment — turning data fragmentation into measurable yield, uptime, and margin.
What plant operations and IT ask before connecting the factory floor.
No. The platform reads from PLCs, historians, and SCADA you already run over standard protocols. There are no controller changes and no line downtime to integrate.
Edge gateways buffer locally and reconcile on reconnect, so a WAN outage costs no telemetry — which matters because the sites with the worst connectivity are usually the ones you most want data from.
Connectivity is segmented and read-oriented, aligned to ISA/IEC 62443 zones, so integration does not widen the attack surface into the control network.
Each asset is modelled against its own history rather than a fleet-wide threshold, so a thirty-year-old press and a new one are judged on their own behaviour.
Yes. ERP, EDI, and carrier feeds build a tier-N dependency graph, so a sub-supplier disruption surfaces before it stops a line rather than after.
Protocol support, edge buffering, and ISA-95 asset modelling.
CatalogVibration, thermal, and pressure models with per-asset tuning.
GuideBuilding and scoring a tier-N supplier dependency model.
RelatedThe signal layer underneath predictive maintenance.
Instrument a single production line and see prediction to work order in a working session.