Multi-Omics Ready
Source connectors for FHIR and HL7v2, with OMOP, NGS, and proteomics formats landing alongside them in one governed store.
Bring clinical, research, and safety data into connected workflows with access controls and traceability at every step.
Source connectors for FHIR and HL7v2, with OMOP, NGS, and proteomics formats landing alongside them in one governed store.
Field-level encryption, k-anonymity de-identification, and tokenization built into the engine — auditable from clinic to publication.
Disproportionality analysis, ML-driven adverse-event clustering, and ICSR-ready exports for FDA, EMA, and PMDA submissions.
Clinical and research data carries the strictest handling requirements on the platform, so governance leads rather than follows.
Ingests EHR, claims, omics, and trial data across FHIR, OMOP, and HL7v2 without moving PHI off your premises.
Learn moreEnforces PHI classification, de-identification, and consent at the point of query, with lifetime audit retention.
Learn moreRuns cohort building, real-world evidence analysis, and regulatory submission outputs on de-identified data.
Learn moreDrives pharmacovigilance signal detection and federated learning without centralising patient records.
Learn moreIndustry use-case map
These reference workflows connect the business decision to the data, controls, platform surfaces, and people required to operate it in production.
Standardize clinical, claims, laboratory, and research records against governed terminology while retaining source meaning and patient protections.
How the work moves
Connect the signal
EHR, claims, and patient operations · Clinical trials and research data · Clinical terminology and master data
Apply control
Data quality contracts · Privacy and minimization · End-to-end lineage
Build and deliver
GeneFlow Engineering · GeneCatalog & Knowledge · Cortex SQL & Warehouse
Decide and act
Reusable clinical data products with consistent definitions and visible provenance.
Participating roles
Platform surfaces
Business outcome
Reusable clinical data products with consistent definitions and visible provenance.
Explore the full industry solutionThe governing constraint in health data is that identified records must stay inside a narrow boundary while research needs breadth. Tokenisation at the boundary lets cohorts be assembled and studied across sources without PHI ever reaching the analytical layer — and re-identification, where clinically warranted, remains a controlled and audited operation.
Every stage is validated under GxP and recorded to a 21 CFR Part 11-aligned audit trail, so a study is defensible at submission.
FHIR, HL7v2, OMOP, NGS, and proteomics land through supplied connectors into one governed store.
Field-level encryption and tokenisation apply as data lands, so PHI never propagates into the analytical layer.
Assemble de-identified cohorts across sources and sites, with inclusion criteria versioned as part of the study record.
Run RWE analyses and PV signal detection with outputs traceable to the exact cohort definition and data version.
Health data work is constrained less by analysis than by what you are permitted to move where.
Identified records stay in their compliance zone; analysis runs on tokenised equivalents with controlled re-identification.
Query multiple trial sites or health systems without centralising their patient data into one custodial store.
NGS and proteomics handled alongside claims and EHR, so multi-modal cohorts do not require a bespoke pipeline.
Disproportionality analysis and adverse-event clustering with ICSR-ready exports for FDA, EMA, and PMDA.
Installation, operational, and performance qualification documentation supplied to support your validated state.
A cohort definition plus a data version reproduces the exact population used in a published analysis.
Research, clinical operations, and safety have very different obligations over the same underlying records.
Combine genomic, claims, and EHR data into one de-identified cohort without negotiating a bespoke extract per source.
Cohort construction in days rather than months.
Run disproportionality analysis continuously over real-world data rather than waiting for a periodic review cycle.
Signals surfaced closer to when they emerge.
Trace any figure in a filing back through the cohort definition and data version under a Part 11-aligned audit trail.
Inspection readiness as a standing state.
Most health data architectures protect PHI by keeping datasets apart, which is also why research is slow.
| Dimension | Before Genedata | With Genedata |
|---|---|---|
| PHI handling | Protected by keeping datasets separated | Tokenised at the boundary, analysis on de-identified data |
| Multi-site studies | Centralise patient data under one custodian | Federated queries, data stays with each site |
| Cohort building | A bespoke extract negotiated per source | Governed queries across mapped models |
| Reproducibility | A cohort described in a methods section | A versioned definition that regenerates exactly |
| Inspection | Evidence assembled ahead of each audit | A continuous Part 11-aligned audit trail |
Genedata Healthcare & Life Science gives translational researchers, clinical operations, and pharmacovigilance teams the same governed substrate — so insights move faster without compromising the patient relationship.
What clinical operations, research, and compliance teams ask first.
No. The platform deploys inside your own environment, and federated approaches let multi-site analysis run without centralising patient records at all.
Field-level encryption, tokenisation, and k-anonymity are applied in the engine rather than by a preprocessing step, so a researcher queries de-identified data by default and re-identification is a separately governed privilege.
The audit-trail and change-control primitives a 21 CFR Part 11 validation depends on are in place — tamper-evident audit, versioned pipelines — is available, and the platform's own audit record supplies much of the evidence.
FHIR, OMOP, and HL7v2 with mappings supplied, so mapping to a common research model is configuration rather than a bespoke ETL project.
Disproportionality analysis and adverse-event clustering run against the same governed record, with ICSR-ready exports for FDA, EMA, and PMDA submission.
Platform controls mapped to HIPAA safeguards with evidence.
ComplianceWhich Part 11 requirements the platform's audit and change control support, and which need process outside it.
ArchitectureFHIR and OMOP mapping, cohort building, and federated analysis.
RelatedEncryption, key custody, and the tamper-evident audit chain.
Build a de-identified cohort against your own data model with a solutions engineer.